The article in the Guardian says that the President has made almost 80 ambassadorial nominations, of which 56% went to political appointees. I don’t know where they got that number. Below is the breakdown of the official Chief of Mission List dated November 9, 2009 from the State Department:
BREAKDOWN OF CHIEFS OF MISSION LIST: 172 Total
- 102 (59%) Current career Ambassadors (includes Chief of Mission to USNATO)
- 33 (19%) Current non-career Ambassadors (includes Chiefs of Mission to USUN, UNVIE)
- 37 (22%) Vacant
Updated: 12/5 There is something wrong with this Chiefs of Mission List put together by the State Department's HR office. The USNATO is actually a non-career appointee (Ambassador Daalder). Other noncareer appointees were also appointed/confirmed to USUN, OECD, OAS, AU, and USEU as of November 2009. The UNVIE appointee on the other hand is a career diplomat (Ambassador Davies), not a noncareer appointee as indicated above. This list also put down Ambassador Carlos Pascual (Mexico) as a career appointee. He was no longer in the active FS when he was appointed to the position in Mexico, so he should have been included in the non-career appointees for purposes of this breakdown. From best I could tell, there were 42 political appointees out of 172 as of end of November. Which put the percentage of political appointees currently at 24%. Let's see how much higher this would go by the President's first year in office.
AFSA's Ambassadors List is here. They have a total of 185 positions in the list and had political appointees posted at 54 or 29.2%
No comments:
Post a Comment