Image by devilarts via Flickr
Last week, the smart folks over at the Stimson Center’s Budget Insight blog had this up:
The size of the military, its budget, and its overseas footprint are all substantially larger than the US civilian foreign policy agencies, as the data below shows.
The defense budget is nearly 13 times bigger than all US civilian foreign policy budgets combined. For Fiscal Year 2010, Congress has provided $636.3 billion for defense and $50.6 billion for diplomacy and foreign assistance. Although the diplomacy and foreign assistance budget has grown faster since 9/11 than defense, this growth has not significantly changed this fiscal imbalance.
The Defense Department (DOD) has the largest overseas presence of any federal agency, including the State Department and US Agency for International Development (USAID). In November 2008, for every 1 USAID employee deployed overseas, there were 23 State Department employees deployed and 600 military/civilian personnel deployed overseas from DOD. Increasingly US interests are represented by someone in uniform or working for the military, as contrasted with a diplomat or foreign assistance provider.
The overseas footprint of DOD is significantly larger than that of the civilian agencies. In November 2008, for every 1 USAID overseas mission, there were 3 embassies/consular posts, and 9 military bases.
A symbol of the imbalance between DOD and State − in 2008, DOD spent roughly $16 billion on fuel. That is more than the entire cost of running the State Department, which was $13.5 billion.
Read the whole thing here.